Location
Blog
Distracted Driving Due to Phone Use Is Changing Car Accident Claims
- posted: Feb. 10, 2026
In recent years, distracted driving has earned a reputation as the “new drunk driving.” The wide use of smartphones has fueled an alarming increase in crashes resulting from driver distraction. Insurers and defense attorneys are increasingly confronted with claims that phone use was the true cause of accidents, which can have a strong impact on a victims’ ability to achieve a fair recovery.
Driver distraction can take one or more of these forms:
Manual distractions are activities that require a driver to remove their hands from the wheel, such as texting, eating or fiddling with navigation controls.
Visual distractions divert the driver's eyes away from the road. This can be due to glancing at a GPS map, scanning a social media notification or checking who just messaged them.
Cognitive distractions are less visible but just as hazardous, occurring when a driver's mind wanders or becomes engrossed in a phone conversation, even with hands-free technology.
Texting is uniquely dangerous because it combines manual, visual and cognitive distractions all at once, exponentially amplifying crash risks.
Common crash scenarios underscore the dangers posed by distracted driving. Rear-end collisions often occur when drivers fail to brake in time due to delayed reaction caused by glancing at a screen. Intersections are hotspots for accidents when distracted drivers overlook stop lights or yield signs. Lane drifting and overcorrection can cause a vehicle to collide with another or to veer off the road. Distracted drivers’ diminished situational awareness also leads to pedestrian and cyclist collisions that could otherwise have been averted.
For crash victims, proving that the other driver was distracted can support a liability claim, but obtaining evidence is critical. The following are valuable types:
Witnesses may testify to seeing the at-fault driver using their phone or behaving erratically.
Dash cam or surveillance footage can provide objective visual evidence of the moment the driver’s focus shifted.
Subpoenaed phone records can confirm calls, texts or app usage that coincides exactly with the crash timeline.
Accident reconstruction experts can analyze vehicle data and reaction times to support claims that a reasonable, attentive driver would have avoided the collision.
Insurance companies are often quick to argue that a claimant’s own distraction contributed to fault or that there is insufficient proof of phone use. They may downplay the role of distraction, especially if evidence is limited or delayed. Early involvement of an experienced auto accident attorney is vital for advice and for swift action to preserve critical electronic data before it is deleted or lost.
The law firm of Walsh & Franseen in Edmond, Oklahoma provides dedicated legal counsel to people injured in auto accidents. To schedule a free consultation, call us at 405-843-7600 or contact us online.
Distracted Driving Due to Phone Use Is Changing Car Accident Claims
- posted: Feb. 10, 2026
In recent years, distracted driving has earned a reputation as the “new drunk driving.” The wide use of smartphones has fueled an alarming increase in crashes resulting from driver distraction. Insurers and defense attorneys are increasingly confronted with claims that phone use was the true cause of accidents, which can have a strong impact on a victims’ ability to achieve a fair recovery.
Driver distraction can take one or more of these forms:
Manual distractions are activities that require a driver to remove their hands from the wheel, such as texting, eating or fiddling with navigation controls.
Visual distractions divert the driver's eyes away from the road. This can be due to glancing at a GPS map, scanning a social media notification or checking who just messaged them.
Cognitive distractions are less visible but just as hazardous, occurring when a driver's mind wanders or becomes engrossed in a phone conversation, even with hands-free technology.
Texting is uniquely dangerous because it combines manual, visual and cognitive distractions all at once, exponentially amplifying crash risks.
Common crash scenarios underscore the dangers posed by distracted driving. Rear-end collisions often occur when drivers fail to brake in time due to delayed reaction caused by glancing at a screen. Intersections are hotspots for accidents when distracted drivers overlook stop lights or yield signs. Lane drifting and overcorrection can cause a vehicle to collide with another or to veer off the road. Distracted drivers’ diminished situational awareness also leads to pedestrian and cyclist collisions that could otherwise have been averted.
For crash victims, proving that the other driver was distracted can support a liability claim, but obtaining evidence is critical. The following are valuable types:
Witnesses may testify to seeing the at-fault driver using their phone or behaving erratically.
Dash cam or surveillance footage can provide objective visual evidence of the moment the driver’s focus shifted.
Subpoenaed phone records can confirm calls, texts or app usage that coincides exactly with the crash timeline.
Accident reconstruction experts can analyze vehicle data and reaction times to support claims that a reasonable, attentive driver would have avoided the collision.
Insurance companies are often quick to argue that a claimant’s own distraction contributed to fault or that there is insufficient proof of phone use. They may downplay the role of distraction, especially if evidence is limited or delayed. Early involvement of an experienced auto accident attorney is vital for advice and for swift action to preserve critical electronic data before it is deleted or lost.
The law firm of Walsh & Franseen in Edmond, Oklahoma provides dedicated legal counsel to people injured in auto accidents. To schedule a free consultation, call us at 405-843-7600 or contact us online.
Contact the Firm
